Talk:Bae Noo-ri
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
![]() | On 28 May 2020, it was proposed that this article be moved from Bae Noo-ri to Bae Nu-ri. The result of the discussion was not moved. |
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Bae Noo-ri. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140426044735/http://tvdaily.mk.co.kr/read.php3?aid=1391295600646898002 to http://tvdaily.mk.co.kr/read.php3?aid=1391295600646898002
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:20, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
Requested move 28 May 2020
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: no consensus (non-admin closure) ~ Amkgp 💬 17:49, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
Bae Noo-ri → Bae Nu-ri – her name's wrong when it's searched on Google and She is using currently 'Bae Nu-ri' as her English name in every formal cases. 211.192.175.204 (talk) 06:04, 28 May 2020 (UTC) —Relisting. Natg 19 (talk) 00:45, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
- Support. 배누리 romanizes to "Bae Nu-ri."[1] I don't think the subject is notable enough to have a non-standard romanization. Allan Rice (talk) 00:44, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose reliable sources also use Bae Noo-ri [2], [3]. As for the comment above, how notabale someone is does not determine how their name is spelt. Alex (talk) 09:02, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
- Why would you think that either the Korea Herald or the Straits Times spells this name the way the subject wants it to be spelled? Both sites give her little more than a passing mention. Neither spelling shows up on Chosun Ilbo or on Yonhap. These sites strike me as the logical places to look for K-pop RS. Allan Rice (talk) 11:41, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
- @Allan Rice: I didn't say it was her personal preference, I said that reliable sources also use the current spelling. Your only argument to support was that the subject isn't "notable enough" for the current spelling, which is a pretty poor argument. Alex (talk) 11:49, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
- My argument is the proposed title is a direct romanization of her Korean name. A couple of passing mentions in English-language RS is not a basis to use another format. Allan Rice (talk) 11:58, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
- @Allan Rice: I didn't say it was her personal preference, I said that reliable sources also use the current spelling. Your only argument to support was that the subject isn't "notable enough" for the current spelling, which is a pretty poor argument. Alex (talk) 11:49, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
- The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.